Ford EcoBoost: Firing on all cylinders

LinkedIn +

How do you make one of the best engines currently in production even better? That is the colossal engineering task facing Ford engineers as work gathers pace on the next-generation 1.0 EcoBoost, the current iteration of which is the only powertrain to have ever won the overall International Engine of the Year Award three consecutive times (from 2012 to 2014), and which narrowly missed out on top spot this year by just seven points.

One measure that engineers in Cologne, Germany, are seriously considering is implementing cylinder deactivation technology that sees Ford’s first triple design scale down to a two-cylinder operation in certain driving circumstances to further save on fuel and emissions. Early on-road tests using prototype vehicles have shown fuel efficiency improvements of 6% using cylinder-on-demand.

But for Carsten Weber, head of the advanced engine engineering team at Ford of Europe, such significant real-world economy gains were not a major surprise: “To be honest, at the start I thought 6% was a big number, but now that’s not the case. My actual fear was to not achieve certain goals on the combustion side of energy management because I feared we could not harvest it on such a small engine. I was worried that such a small engine would basically shake like hell, with the driver’s glasses falling off!”

That direct relationship between saving on fuel and making sure the new 1.0 EcoBoost has acceptable on-road driving characteristics, including NVH as well as ensuring a seamless switch down from three to two-cylinders, was critical for the Ford team. As a result, controlling actuators more precisely and understanding the optimal points for when to switch the valvetrain on and off has been key to this program and, in particular, to the new-gen prototype engines.

For testing, engineers equipped a Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost with cylinder deactivation hardware that allowed them to monitor deactivation of one cylinder, and also a rolling cylinder deactivation to run the engine in ‘half-engine’ mode. Weber insists the prototypes feel – and drive – like a three-cylinder, meaning that the switch down and up is seamless.

“It’s absolutely smooth in that respect. But that’s the trade off – how much we can improve fuel economy versus NVH. Our position going into this project was no compromise regarding NVH,” he explains. Also aiding those NVH goals is engineering know-how from Schaeffler and LuK, and specifically with the development of a dual mass flywheel, a pendulum absorber and tuned clutch disc.

In total there are six prototype 1.0 EcoBoost units with cylinder deactivation being assessed, and ETi has learned that not all of them feature the current engine’s impressive Conti turbocharger that reaches 250,000rpm with virtually no turbo lag. As such, it’s not a given that the new-gen design will carry over the Conti blower, with the EcoBoost family also using forced induction solutions from BorgWarner and Honeywell.

Just as interesting is that Weber does not see the remarkable 1.4 TSI ACT development from Volkswagen as a benchmark. “To be honest, I personally never drove this engine, which is really a shame because I’ve heard it’s good. It wasn’t a benchmark; it wasn’t a focus area for us. That’s a four-cylinder engine, ours is a three-cylinder and that’s the critical point, especially due to the larger firing order – 240° between every ignition.”

Yet despite the obvious merits of the technology, Weber admits that his team are not just looking at cylinder deactivation for v2 of the 1.0 EcoBoost.

“We considered a few things, and the cylinder deactivation system we’ve showcased is definitely not the only technology that will feature in the future engine. However, it’s an interesting route and a subject we’ve been working on for a long time because, to be honest, it makes a big impact.”

He won’t reveal exactly what other technologies Ford is working on, but he rules out a hybridized 1.0 EcoBoost for now. “Hybridization is a big animal that’s also cost intensive. And then there’s the question of whether we do this in a high-voltage arena or low-voltage.”

Instead, Weber hints at solutions that lead to an overall reduction of parasitic losses. “We can do things significantly smarter than in the past by having more control over various supporting functions such as pumps, like activating them on demand,” he says. “Stuff like that will give us a lot of opportunities, and then the combustion system itself is subject to continuous optimization.”

For full exclusive details on the next-generation 1.0 EcoBoost engine, be sure to read the September issue of Engine + Powertrain Technology International.

August 5, 2015

Share this story:

About Author


Dean has been with UKi Media & Events for over a decade, having previously cut his journalistic teeth writing and editing for various automotive and engineering titles. He combines extensive knowledge of all things automotive with a passion for driving, and experience testing countless new vehicles, engines and technologies around the world. As well as his role as editor-in-chief across a range of UKi's media titles, he is also co-chair of the judging panel of the International Engine + Powertrain of the Year Awards.

Comments are closed.